Prescott Bush was a Nazi-whore, but his father Samuel was worse (WWI) [Archive] - Nachos BBS - You got game, but can you spell?

PDA

View Full Version : Prescott Bush was a Nazi-whore, but his father Samuel was worse (WWI)


hustler
11-02-2003, 06:01 AM
Samuel Prescott Bush (1863 October 4 Brick Church NJ - 1948 February 8 Columbus OH) was the father of Senator Prescott Bush, grandfather of George H. W. Bush and greatgrandfather George W. Bush.

He was the son of the Rev. James Smith Bush.

The Grand Patriarch of the Bush clan founded the Buckeye Steel Castings Company of Ohio in 1894 as The Buckeye Malleable Iron & Coupler Company. They manufactured steel car couplers for trains, truck bodies, bolsters, truck fenders, yokes, and (among other things) made railway parts for the Harrimans. The two families were closely associated at least until the end of World War II. Samuel, as did all the other Industrialists of the time, grew very wealthy and influential.

He was the first president of National Manufacturers Association, and cofounder of Scioto Country Club and Columbus Academy.

In the spring of 1918, Bush became chief of the Ordnance, Small Arms and Ammunition Section of the War Industries Board of Bernard Baruch and Clarence Dillon, with national responsibility for government assistance to and relations with Remington and other weapons companies.BUsh was essentially taking national responsibility for government assistance to his own Remington Arms Company and other weapon makers. Through these weapons manufacturers, Samuel Bush made and sold arms to 75% of the WWI combatants on both sides.

Senate hearings in 1934 by the Nye committee attacked the ‘Merchants of Death’—war profiteers such as Remington Arms and the British Vickers company—whose salesmen had manipulated many nations into war and then supplied weapons to all sides.

Unfortunately most of the records and correspondence of Bush's arms-related section of the government have been burned ‘to save space’ in the National Archives.

****How convenient...****

Tarpley and Chaitkin say:

"With the war mobilization conducted under the supervision of the War Industries Board, U.S. consumers and taxpayers showered unprecedented fortunes on war producers and certain holders of raw materials and patents. Hearings in 1934 by the committee of U.S. Senator Gerald Nye attacked the "Merchants of Death", war profiteers such as Remington Arms and the British Vickers company, whose salesmen had manipulated many nations into wars, and then supplied all sides with the weapons to fight them. Most of the records and correspondence of Samuel Bush's arms- related section of the government have been burned, "to save space" in the National Archives. This matter of destroyed or misplaced records should be of concern to citizens of a constitutional republic. Unfortunately, it is a rather constant impediment with regard to researching George Bush's background: He is certainly the most "covert" American chief executive."

Samuel Bush was labeled a "Merchant of Death" in the years following the Great War as investigations began into the instigators of the war and of the new emerging world militarism. The German Army under the Kaiser was the largest and most well armed in the world in 1914, and they were largely armed by Samuel Bush. After WWI, Germany was stripped of their arms, but Samuel Bush was allowed to keep his millions, and his arms business was allowed to grow and prosper. In 1944 he was awarded a huge government contract to make armor casings for WWII. He died shortly after the war ended in 1948, within months of the passage of the National Security Act.

The empire of Evil.


-----------------------------------------

THE BUSH EMPIRE

How four generations of arms, oil, fascism, and US Govt. defiance made America's First Family

by Charles Shaw

"Almost everybody knows that George W. is the son of the 41st President. But fewer know that the family has wielded power in corporate boardrooms and capital corridors for a century and a half. On his mom's side, he's related to Franklin Pierce, the 14th President (1853-57). His dad's paternal grandfather, Samuel P. Bush, was an Ohio steel executive and the first president of the National Association of Manufacturers. Samuel's son, Prescott, became a Connecticut senator. Prescott's wife, Dorothy, was the daughter of George Herbert Walker, a co-founder of Brown Brothers Harriman, the oldest and largest private investment house on Wall Street. The Walker family helped finance the construction of Madison Square Garden and the Belmont Park racetrack--and later owned a big chunk of the New York Mets"


--Business Week, Nov 15, 1999

The previous quote embodies the public face of the Bush family, one of the richest and most influential American political dynasties in all our history. But it is almost shocking how little people actually know about the Bush family, particularly the history of the Bush men. I thought we might look beneath the veneer at the true face of America's political dynasty.

I am going to open with a story that is guaranteed to blow your hair back. This is a story that has been impossible to confirm in the mainstream press. Of course, this is part of the whole story, and why curiously the story keeps surfacing and disappearing all over the Internet. At the very least, this story is referred to enough to qualify as a modern legend. This is the extraordinary story of a dinner date that was scheduled to happen on March 31st 1981, the day of the strange assassination attempt on the life of former President Ronald Reagan. What should have been the biggest story of the 1980's seems to have been wiped clean from history, systematically prevented from ever again being mentioned by corporate media.

SNIP

http://www.newtopiamagazine.net/issues/v2issue3/features/bushempire.shtml

Matic
11-02-2003, 08:21 AM
And does anyone care? If everyone like you who is out to smear the other side would do something more productful the world would be a much better place. Bringing up what somone's grandfather and great grandfather did has absolutly no relavence in today's world. Thats like me saying your great great great great grandparents participated in the salem witch trials and were repsonsible for burning at the stake those innocent women/girls, so obviously we can all draw some logical line from their actions to your actions and say hustler your an evil person who wants to burn girls on a stake:tard:

Kurgen
11-02-2003, 09:31 AM
hustler I gotta agree with most other people here.

I'm no friend of bush, I think he's a nincompoop with about as much skill at leading this country as the dirt under my fingernail. And he's as trustworthy as a mongoose in an egg factory.

Nevertheless, in this country we don't hold a person responsible for the actions of their ancestors. That was done long ago, in other countries/societies. But not america.

Personally, I think Bush Sr. was a decent president, and a decent man. bush jr is a completely different animal, someone who excelled at nothing, impressed noone, yet managed to sneak in a presidency.

Its fine to publicize bush's failings. But you certainly have enough ammunition to do so from HIS OWN actions, without resorting to his great grandfather and great great grandfather. I understand you want to point to long-standing familial lack-of-morals, but its a pretty weak argument given so many OTHER arguments that are much stronger against bush.

JackDrek
11-02-2003, 11:32 AM
I wouldn't say grandfather/great-grandfather's actions have no relevance in our current lives. That's not quite the same as the actions of our ancestors in Salem. Most people actually knew their grandparents, at least enough to hear what these old fashioned values were. In the case of Bush, I think it's important because he ran on a family values platform. It's also important because he's in favor of bailing out big businesses and has a family history of being in big business (i.e., a conflict of interest?).

On the other hand, it's really not THAT important. He has a record, now, which has many flaws you can point out.

hustler
11-02-2003, 02:45 PM
I am just demonstrating that the Bush clan is detrimental to America. It isn't anything new for them as their history shows. Are you going to say that isn't important? That we should just forget that this whole family has been engaged in war-profiting for almost a hundred years...ah...but **** it...that was in the past right?

Wrong.

Dumbya is just carrying the torch of his family.

ClydeFrog
11-03-2003, 05:43 AM
What it demonstrates to me is that you are so completely absorbed by your distaste for “Dumbya” that you will grasp at any disparaging piece of info regardless of its relevance. Great-grand father? Hello? Who’s the real sheep here?

I could tell you very little about my grandfathers much less my great-grand fathers. To suggest I should be judged by what they’ve done – good or bad – is utterly ridiculous.

HankTheTank
11-03-2003, 10:10 AM
Penis.

hustler
11-03-2003, 10:48 AM
Clyde,

I'm a sheep for wanting the truth? Riiiiiiiight. That is right up there with war is peace. Is your head still spinning?

ClydeFrog
11-03-2003, 11:03 AM
No, you're a sheep for believing whoever is telling you that Bush (or anybody) should be judged by the actions of their grandfather and great grandfather as reported from a source that says:

This is a story that has been impossible to confirm in the mainstream press. Of course, this is part of the whole story, and why curiously the story keeps surfacing and disappearing all over the Internet. At the very least, this story is referred to enough to qualify as a modern legend.

Why would a "modern legend" about Bush's ancestors influence my feelings about Bush in the least when I already have so much to judge him by? IMO you're really reaching with this. I have a feeling if you look into anybodies ancestry to the Civil War you'll find some pretty unsavory things.

hustler
11-03-2003, 02:32 PM
I actually know a lot about my family history having spent a lot of time researching it when I was in college. My family owned quite a few slaves back in the day. Today though I say that holding people in slavery is abhorrent and criminal. Now to put this in perspective...if my family held slaves even after the war and continued working in the slave trade today what would people think of us?

They would probably think we need to go to jail. Bush's family has a deep history in war-profiteering and so far none of them have been sent to jail for it. Which is too bad.

Ker
11-03-2003, 04:08 PM
Unfortunately most of the records and correspondence of Bush's arms-related section of the government have been burned ‘to save space’ in the National Archives.

So you're lying?